911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war
Before we begin it is important to note the ancient ruse of the money changer dating back to 33AD was morphed into a pretend loan by today’s purported banking in 1150AD.
The money changers in 33AD were essentially exchanging 1 talent in one denominated currency for 2 talents of another denominated currency, both of which talents where nearly the same weight or measure by a matter of grams back then.
To actually purchase in the market an individual would first have to give a money changer 2 talents in coin & in return receive 1 talent in another coin, so one can at least trade in the market with that specific talent of coin (eg: bank money).
Essentially the money changers were robbing the individual of 1 talent for risking nothing of their own by simply exchanging 1 for 2 — taking 100% unearned profit. This unjust intervention in all markets today is the banks first crime of theft — stealing a sum of principal.
Since 1150AD the ancient ruse of the money changer that steals 100% in principal has been disguised as a loan, which is in truth a purported loan that neither ethically or rationally transpires in the first place, only as a means to purposely hide an age old theft that was otherwise so blatantly obvious
Logically if an individual paid a money changer any more than 2 talents for only receiving 1 talent its therefore paying interest to a money changer for reasons I explain in the following paragraphs.
Of course we can determine the only difference to ancient money changers exchanging 1 for 2 is modern day money changers are exchanging 1 for 1 by merely publishing further representations of the money we create. In truth banks are only pretending to exchange 1 for 1, simply because there is only 1 talent of commensurable value representing what value you give up by promising your immediate & or future production before publication — before any sale or subsequent deposit — where its clearly evident the bank is only ever pretending to risk or give up 1 talent in value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.
In essence the banks sleight of hand is basically handing the principal value you just created back to you in a pretend loan so you can trade in the market, & only then as a consequence thereafter charge you a further sum of principal in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place.
We can likewise further determine the unjust imposition of unwarranted interest is therefore the banks second crime of theft — resulting from the first crime of theft — stealing 2 talents in total or 2X the principal for neither risking or giving up anything of value.
Considering the ancient money changers got away with stealing 100% for so long it only stands to reason why today’s modern day money changers, or what are commonly referred to as banks are getting away with stealing 200% plus — when you are all duped into actually believing the bank loans you money in the first place.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)