Tags

, , , , ,

#SHOW COMMENTS

This post is addressing the Anthony Migchels Cult propaganda about MPE on his blog at realcurrencies.

According to wikipedia a cult is the sociological classifications of religious movements, a cult is a religious or social group with socially deviant or novel beliefs and practices..

Religion:
A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence

Belief:
Belief is a mental representation, treated in various academic disciplines, especially philosophy and psychology, of a sentient being’s attitude toward the likelihood or truth of something.

Social Group:
A social group within social sciences has been defined as two or more people who interact with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity.

Socially Deviant:
In sociology, deviance describes an action or behavior that violates social norms, including a formally enacted rule (e.g., crime),as well as informal violations of social norms (e.g., rejecting folkways and mores). It is the purview of sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and criminologists to study how these norms are created, how they change over time and how they are enforced.

Novel:
Novelty (derived from Latin word novus for “new”) is the quality of being new, or following from that, of being striking, original or unusual.[1] Novelty may be the shared experience of a new cultural phenomenon or the subjective perception of an individual.

So one might ask now is MPE a Cult?

Q: Might MPE be defined as a religion?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined as a belief?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined a Social Group?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined as socially defiant?
A: Technically NO, MPE is in fact not in deviance of an enacted rule based on formal agreement that would otherwise be termed a violation, simply because no where in history has banking ever formerly been assented by the people, so there has been no formal agreement that would otherwise stipulate a violation or deviance of a presumed norm, or an enacted rule, bereft of any formal proofs that has just instead been imposed as an assumption. (eg: bank loans). On the contrary MPE is far from informal when it  formally proves & demonstrates a particular presumed norm, purported agreement or enacted rule is based on a LIE.

Q: Might MPE be defined as Novel?
A: Possibly Yes.

The next question I guess is Banking, or any purported solution that preserves the crime of banking a cult.

Q: Might banking be defined as a Religion?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as a belief?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as a Social Group?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as socially defiant?
A: Absolutely YES, banking violates the social norms by pretending to loan money, including a formally enacted rule (e.g: the crime of theft). as well as informal violations of social norms that presumes banks loan money, bereft of any formal proof or qualification.

Q: Might Banking be defined as a Social Group?
A: Possibly Yes.

I put to the reader, according to wikipedia what belief that only two people are in agreement is not a cult today, or what might we just assume is some cult today that’s socially defiant?

Have you ever considered the assumption that just asserts banks loan money is a cult belief, bereft of any formal proof or qualification, so could this mean those who propagate the idea MPE is a cult are calling the kettle black here, & it is they who are banking cultists that want nothing more than to preserve the crime of banking, particularly the banks first crime pretending to loan a sum of principal, irrationally denying all along banks not only steal a sum of principal in a pretended loan but any interest we pay above the sum of principal is likewise stealing all that much further from us when each & everyone of us spends money today, where artificial price inflation is not caused by circulatory inflation at all, but instead caused by the very interest we all pay on our personal falsified debts, that can only ever give one (banking cults) the illusion that irrationally assumes increasing prices means increasing value or purported growth.

So who then is this Anthony Migchels that began all this Cult nonsense about MPE? Is it because MPE advocates have already exposed him for his “Mutual Credit “ proposal after years of openly plagiarizing MPE, & Anthony in retaliation has just propagated further lies to point you away from the one & only solution, where Anthony assumes a government can just create, issue & possibly even loan money without ever giving up commensurable consideration of value, either in the mere publication of money or any purported loan , does Anthony not want to preserve the banks first crime, or be it preserve the purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations, denying us the right to issue a promissory obligation to each other free from the very crime he wants to preserve in his “Mutual Credit “ proposal. Is Anthony Migchels not a Banking Cultist & one of many cult leaders today who wants nothing more but to preserve the very crime MPE expose’s?

If anyone would like to read an in depth discussion I had with Anthony Migchels not only disproving everything he asserts in his MPE cult propaganda post before he even published it I might add, but providing further evidence with before & after screen shots of his website proving he has purposely edited out whole paragraphs in my comments there that were disproving his assumptions to his readers in the first place, only to inform his readers I’m some how brainwashed with what I can prove with second grade mathematics & the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child,  so by all means please I invite anyone reading this to read on HERE. I have nothing to hide.

Related link.
What is the root cause of all Inflation

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

Advertisements