Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

#SHOW COMMENTS

This post is addressing the Anthony Migchels Cult propaganda about MPE at realcurrencies.

According to wikipedia a cult is the sociological classifications of religious movements, a cult is a religious or social group with socially deviant or novel beliefs and practices..

Religion:
A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence

Belief:
Belief is a mental representation, treated in various academic disciplines, especially philosophy and psychology, of a sentient being’s attitude toward the likelihood or truth of something.

Social Group:
A social group within social sciences has been defined as two or more people who interact with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity.

Socially Deviant:
In sociology, deviance describes an action or behavior that violates social norms, including a formally enacted rule (e.g., crime),as well as informal violations of social norms (e.g., rejecting folkways and mores). It is the purview of sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and criminologists to study how these norms are created, how they change over time and how they are enforced.

Novel:
Novelty (derived from Latin word novus for “new”) is the quality of being new, or following from that, of being striking, original or unusual.[1] Novelty may be the shared experience of a new cultural phenomenon or the subjective perception of an individual.

So one might ask now is MPE a Cult?

Q: Might MPE be defined as a religion?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined as a belief?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined a Social Group?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might MPE be defined as socially defiant?
A: Technically NO, MPE is in fact not in deviance of an enacted rule based on formal agreement that would otherwise be termed a violation, simply because no where in history has banking ever formerly been assented by the people, so there has been no formal agreement that would otherwise stipulate a violation or deviance of a presumed norm, or an enacted rule, bereft of any formal proofs that has just instead been imposed as an assumption. (eg: bank loans). On the contrary MPE is far from informal when it  formally proves & demonstrates a particular presumed norm, purported agreement or enacted rule is based on a LIE.

Q: Might MPE be defined as Novel?
A: Possibly Yes.

The next question I guess is Banking, or any purported solution that preserves the crime of banking a cult.

Q: Might banking be defined as a Religion?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as a belief?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as a Social Group?
A: Possibly Yes.

Q: Might banking be defined as socially defiant?
A: Absolutely YES, banking violates the social norms by pretending to loan money, including a formally enacted rule (e.g: the crime of theft), as well as informal violations of social norms that presumes banks loan money, bereft of any formal proof or qualification.

Q: Might Banking  be defined as Novel?
A: Possibly Yes.

CONCLUSION:
I put to the reader, according to wikipedia what belief that only two people are in agreement is not a religion today, or what might we just assume is a cult  that’s socially defiant?

Keeping in mind  MPE strictly upholds the formally enacted rule or law that stipulates stealing is a crime of theft without compromise, contradiction or any equivocation. Therefore  MPE in fact does not even qualify as a cult by definition, regardless of informal violations of the social norm that suggests banks do create & or loan us money without a shred of evidence that otherwise proves they actually do.

Have any of you ever considered the assumption that just asserts banks loan us money is a cult belief in itself, bereft of any formal proof or qualification?

Could this possibly mean those who propagate the idea MPE is a cult are calling the kettle black & it is they who are banking cultists who want nothing more than to preserve a monumental crime of theft for their own personal gain, fame or glory. Particularly the banks first crime pretending to loan a sum of principal by irrationally denying all along banks not only steal a sum of principal in a pretended loan, but any interest we pay above the sum of principal is in fact stealing all that much further from us when each & everyone of us spends money today, where artificial price inflation is in fact not caused by circulatory inflation at all, but instead the very interest we all pay on our personal falsified debts, which can only ever give people (banking cults) the illusion that just assumes increasing prices means increasing value or purported growth.

So why did Anthony Migchels begin all this Cult nonsense about MPE?

Is it because MPE advocates have already exposed him for his “Mutual Credit “ proposal after years of openly plagiarizing MPE. Stealing from the MPE thesis only in part to sell the lie to his readers that suggests a mere publisher in his “Mutual Credit “ scam can  create & loan us money that MPE itself disproves, & Anthony in retaliation as a result of being held accountable for his deception has just propagated further lies on the internet suggesting MPE is cult to point everyone away from the one & only solution.

Does Anthony not want to preserve the banks first crime, or be it preserve the purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations by denying us the right to issue a promissory obligation to each other free from the very crime he wants to preserve in his “Mutual Credit “ proposal?

Is Anthony Migchels not a Banking Cultist himself & one of many cult leaders out there today who want nothing more but to preserve the very crime MPE exposes?

If anyone would like to read an in depth discussion I had with Anthony Migchels not only disproving everything he asserts in his MPE cult propaganda before he even published it, but providing further evidence with ” before & after screen shots”  of his website proving he has purposely edited out whole paragraphs in my comments there that were disproving his assumptions, only to inform his readers after the edit I’m somehow brainwashed by a cult with what I can & have already proven on countless occasions using nothing more than  second grade mathematics & the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child.

Please by all means I invite anyone reading this post to read on HERE where I expose this charlatan for who he really is. I have nothing to hide.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

Advertisements